Ford Mustang Fastback
Hatchback · Gasoline · FWD
vs
Audi RS 3 Sportback
Hatchback · Gasoline · AWD
Ford Mustang Fastback
Car A
Ford Mustang Fastback
The Ford Mustang Fastback blends strong performance (450 hp, 0–100 km/h in 4.5 s) with usable four-seat practicality and a 382 L trunk for road trips. It’s thirsty at 12.4 L/100 km, but around 43,000 it offers good value in its segment.
4 seatsHatchbackGasoline5-star safety450 hp
Audi RS 3 Sportback
Car B
Audi RS 3 Sportback
The Audi RS 3 Sportback combines 0–100 km/h in 3.8 s and AWD traction with a five-seat compact layout. Strong everyday pace and control are balanced by a small 282 L trunk and 8.8 L/100 km consumption that make it less suited to cargo-heavy road trips.
5 seatsHatchbackGasoline5-star safety8.8 L/100kmAWD
Why compared alternative pickcross brandsame body typesame powertrainstrong ranking match

Usage fit

Family 58 / 60
City 35 / 51
Budget / value 50 / 51
Road trip 51 / 45
Performance 39 / 45
Cargo 18 / 15
Practical 40 / 46
Premium 39 / 56
Winter 30 / 66

Scores out of 100. Blue = Ford Mustang Fastback · Orange = Audi RS 3 Sportback

Specs side-by-side

Spec Ford Mustang Fastback Audi RS 3 Sportback
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Ford Mustang Fastback

  • 450 hp and 4.5 s 0–100 km/h deliver strong pace
  • Four seats and 382 L trunk support occasional family use and road trips
  • Signals indicate a strong standing for safety among key factors
  • Around 43,000, it represents good value in its segment

Audi RS 3 Sportback

  • Explosive performance: 0–100 km/h in 3.8 s and 400 hp
  • AWD traction and stability help in winter and wet conditions
  • Five seats and compact footprint suit city use
  • Good value in its segment at around 58,000

Verdict

Pick Ford Mustang Fastback if…
Lower entry price
Ford Mustang Fastback starts lower, making it the stronger value pick if budget is a priority.
Pick Audi RS 3 Sportback if…
All-wheel drive
Audi RS 3 Sportback's AWD adds real-world confidence in wet, icy, or mixed-weather conditions.

Related comparisons