Audi RS 3 Sportback
Hatchback · Gasoline · AWD
vs
Ford Focus RS
Hatchback · Gasoline · FWD
Audi RS 3 Sportback
Car A
Audi RS 3 Sportback
The Audi RS 3 Sportback combines 0–100 km/h in 3.8 s and AWD traction with a five-seat compact layout. Strong everyday pace and control are balanced by a small 282 L trunk and 8.8 L/100 km consumption that make it less suited to cargo-heavy road trips.
5 seatsHatchbackGasoline5-star safety400 hpAWD
Ford Focus RS
Car B
Ford Focus RS
The Ford Focus RS blends serious straight-line pace with everyday 5-seat practicality at a price that reads as good value in its segment. Best for drivers who want performance without giving up compact-city usability.
5 seatsHatchbackGasoline5-star safety8.1 L/100km
Why compared same body typesame powertrainsame ranking profilesame seatsstrong ranking match

Usage fit

Family 60 / 57
City 51 / 56
Budget / value 51 / 58
Road trip 45 / 39
Performance 45 / 36
Cargo 15 / 14
Practical 46 / 43
Premium 56 / 29
Winter 66 / 26

Scores out of 100. Blue = Audi RS 3 Sportback · Orange = Ford Focus RS

Specs side-by-side

Spec Audi RS 3 Sportback Ford Focus RS
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Audi RS 3 Sportback

  • Explosive performance: 0–100 km/h in 3.8 s and 400 hp
  • AWD traction and stability help in winter and wet conditions
  • Five seats and compact footprint suit city use
  • Good value in its segment at around 58,000

Ford Focus RS

  • 0-100 km/h in 4.7 s and 266 km/h top speed deliver standout performance
  • Five seats and compact footprint suit family-compact and city use
  • 8.1 L/100 km combined is efficient for its class given the power
  • Price of 36,500 offers good value in its segment

Verdict

Pick Audi RS 3 Sportback if…
Efficiency & everyday ease
Audi RS 3 Sportback is the choice if fuel economy and city-friendly driving are your priority.
Pick Ford Focus RS if…
Performance & capability
Ford Focus RS is the choice if you want more power, speed, or all-weather capability.

Related comparisons