Ford Puma ST-Line X
Crossover · Gasoline
vs
Ford EcoSport Active
Crossover · Gasoline
Ford Puma ST-Line X
Car A
Ford Puma ST-Line X
Balancing family practicality with city-friendly running costs, the Ford Puma ST-Line X mixes a roomy 456 L boot and five-seat layout with efficient 6 L/100 km fuel use. Strong acceleration (0–100 km/h in 6.7 s) adds confidence without chasing outright performance.
5 seatsCrossoverGasoline5-star safety6 L/100km200 hp
Ford EcoSport Active
Car B
Ford EcoSport Active
The Ford EcoSport Active suits budget-focused city driving and small-family duties, pairing efficient 6.5 L/100 km use with a practical 355 L trunk. It offers good value in its segment if you prioritize everyday usability over performance or luxury.
5 seatsCrossoverGasoline4-star safety
Why compared same body typesame brandsame powertrainsame seats

Usage fit

Family 60 / 58
City 56 / 56
Budget / value 52 / 68
Road trip 49 / 44
Performance 24 / 26
Cargo 32 / 26
Practical 41 / 49
Premium 24 / 18
Winter 34 / 30

Scores out of 100. Blue = Ford Puma ST-Line X · Orange = Ford EcoSport Active

Specs side-by-side

Spec Ford Puma ST-Line X Ford EcoSport Active
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Ford Puma ST-Line X

  • Efficient for its class at a combined 6 L/100 km, keeping fuel bills in check
  • Roomy 456 L cargo space suits school runs and weekly shops
  • Quick 0–100 km/h in 6.7 s for confident merging and overtakes
  • Priced around 28,000, offering good value in its segment

Ford EcoSport Active

  • Good value in its segment around 20000
  • Efficient for its class with 6.5 L/100 km combined
  • Practical 5-seat layout and 355 L trunk suit small families
  • Adequate city performance (125 hp, 0–100 km/h in 9.9 s)

Verdict

Pick Ford Puma ST-Line X if…
Best fuel economy
Ford Puma ST-Line X uses 6.0 L/100km vs 6.5 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.
Pick Ford EcoSport Active if…
Performance & capability
Ford EcoSport Active is the choice if you want more power, speed, or all-weather capability.

Related comparisons