Ford Fiesta Titanium
Hatchback · Gasoline · FWD
vs
Ford Puma ST
Hatchback · Gasoline · FWD
Ford Fiesta Titanium
Car A
Ford Fiesta Titanium
The Ford Fiesta Titanium targets city driving and compact-family duties, blending efficient 5.5 L/100 km running and brisk 0-100 km/h in 8.0 s with good value for its segment. Its 292 L trunk and five seats handle everyday needs, though it isn’t built for premium touches or cargo-heavy use.
5 seatsHatchbackGasoline5-star safety5.5 L/100km
Ford Puma ST
Car B
Ford Puma ST
The Ford Puma ST combines lively performance with everyday usefulness, pairing 0–100 km/h in 6.7s with a 456 L boot and five seats. It’s efficient for its class at 6.9 L/100km and offers good value in its segment around 30,000.
5 seatsHatchbackGasoline5-star safety200 hp
Why compared performance gapsame body typesame brandsame powertrainsame seats

Usage fit

Family 61 / 65
City 75 / 59
Budget / value 72 / 64
Road trip 27 / 41
Performance 27 / 28
Cargo 16 / 25
Practical 51 / 51
Premium 15 / 25
Winter 20 / 26

Scores out of 100. Blue = Ford Fiesta Titanium · Orange = Ford Puma ST

Specs side-by-side

Spec Ford Fiesta Titanium Ford Puma ST
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Ford Fiesta Titanium

  • Suits city driving and short commutes
  • Efficient for its class at 5.5 L/100 km
  • Seats 5 with a usable 292 L trunk for everyday family needs
  • Good value in its segment at 22000

Ford Puma ST

  • Punchy acceleration (0–100 km/h in 6.7s) for confident merging and passing
  • Efficient for its class at 6.9 L/100km to help manage running costs
  • Practical 456 L boot and five seats suit growing families
  • Pricing around 30,000 represents good value in its segment

Verdict

Pick Ford Fiesta Titanium if…
Best fuel economy
Ford Fiesta Titanium uses 5.5 L/100km vs 6.9 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.
Pick Ford Puma ST if…
More power
Ford Puma ST puts out 200 hp vs 125 — meaningfully quicker and more confident on motorways.

Related comparisons