Ford Fiesta Active
Hatchback · Gasoline · FWD
vs
Ford Puma ST
Hatchback · Gasoline · FWD
Ford Fiesta Active
Car A
Ford Fiesta Active
A city-focused small car that balances efficiency and practicality at a sensible price. It feels lively enough for daily use and carries a positive safety signal, but cargo capacity and premium appeal are limited.
5 seatsHatchbackGasoline5-star safety5.5 L/100km
Ford Puma ST
Car B
Ford Puma ST
The Ford Puma ST combines lively performance with everyday usefulness, pairing 0–100 km/h in 6.7s with a 456 L boot and five seats. It’s efficient for its class at 6.9 L/100km and offers good value in its segment around 30,000.
5 seatsHatchbackGasoline5-star safety200 hp
Why compared performance gapsame body typesame brandsame powertrainsame seats

Usage fit

Family 60 / 65
City 75 / 59
Budget / value 72 / 64
Road trip 28 / 41
Performance 30 / 28
Cargo 16 / 25
Practical 50 / 51
Premium 15 / 25
Winter 20 / 26

Scores out of 100. Blue = Ford Fiesta Active · Orange = Ford Puma ST

Specs side-by-side

Spec Ford Fiesta Active Ford Puma ST
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Ford Fiesta Active

  • Efficient for its class at 5.5 L/100 km, keeping running costs down
  • Lively everyday performance with 0–100 km/h in 9 s
  • Good value in its segment around 20000
  • Positive safety ranking signal adds peace of mind

Ford Puma ST

  • Punchy acceleration (0–100 km/h in 6.7s) for confident merging and passing
  • Efficient for its class at 6.9 L/100km to help manage running costs
  • Practical 456 L boot and five seats suit growing families
  • Pricing around 30,000 represents good value in its segment

Verdict

Pick Ford Fiesta Active if…
Best fuel economy
Ford Fiesta Active uses 5.5 L/100km vs 6.9 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.
Pick Ford Puma ST if…
More power
Ford Puma ST puts out 200 hp vs 125 — meaningfully quicker and more confident on motorways.

Related comparisons