Ford Mustang Fastback
Hatchback · Gasoline · FWD
vs
Ford Puma ST
Hatchback · Gasoline · FWD
Ford Mustang Fastback
Car A
Ford Mustang Fastback
The Ford Mustang Fastback blends strong performance (450 hp, 0–100 km/h in 4.5 s) with usable four-seat practicality and a 382 L trunk for road trips. It’s thirsty at 12.4 L/100 km, but around 43,000 it offers good value in its segment.
4 seatsHatchbackGasoline5-star safety450 hp
Ford Puma ST
Car B
Ford Puma ST
The Ford Puma ST combines lively performance with everyday usefulness, pairing 0–100 km/h in 6.7s with a 456 L boot and five seats. It’s efficient for its class at 6.9 L/100km and offers good value in its segment around 30,000.
5 seatsHatchbackGasoline5-star safety6.9 L/100km
Why compared same body typesame brandsame powertraindifferent segment

Usage fit

Family 58 / 65
City 35 / 59
Budget / value 50 / 64
Road trip 51 / 41
Performance 39 / 28
Cargo 18 / 25
Practical 40 / 51
Premium 39 / 25
Winter 30 / 26

Scores out of 100. Blue = Ford Mustang Fastback · Orange = Ford Puma ST

Specs side-by-side

Spec Ford Mustang Fastback Ford Puma ST
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Ford Mustang Fastback

  • 450 hp and 4.5 s 0–100 km/h deliver strong pace
  • Four seats and 382 L trunk support occasional family use and road trips
  • Signals indicate a strong standing for safety among key factors
  • Around 43,000, it represents good value in its segment

Ford Puma ST

  • Punchy acceleration (0–100 km/h in 6.7s) for confident merging and passing
  • Efficient for its class at 6.9 L/100km to help manage running costs
  • Practical 456 L boot and five seats suit growing families
  • Pricing around 30,000 represents good value in its segment

Verdict

Pick Ford Mustang Fastback if…
Efficiency & everyday ease
Ford Mustang Fastback is the choice if fuel economy and city-friendly driving are your priority.
Pick Ford Puma ST if…
Performance & capability
Ford Puma ST is the choice if you want more power, speed, or all-weather capability.

Related comparisons