Ford Focus ST
Hatchback · Gasoline · FWD
vs
Ford Puma ST
Hatchback · Gasoline · FWD
Ford Focus ST
Car A
Ford Focus ST
A compact family car that emphasizes efficiency and everyday ease, the Ford Focus ST returns 6.4 L/100 km combined with predictable FWD manners. Ideal for city use and road trips, but not for cargo-heavy hauling or performance thrills.
5 seatsHatchbackGasoline5-star safety6.4 L/100km
Ford Puma ST
Car B
Ford Puma ST
The Ford Puma ST combines lively performance with everyday usefulness, pairing 0–100 km/h in 6.7s with a 456 L boot and five seats. It’s efficient for its class at 6.9 L/100km and offers good value in its segment around 30,000.
5 seatsHatchbackGasoline5-star safety
Why compared same body typesame brandsame powertrain

Usage fit

Family 43 / 65
City 33 / 59
Budget / value 15 / 64
Road trip 36 / 41
Performance 4 / 28
Cargo 0 / 25
Practical 28 / 51
Premium 18 / 25
Winter 26 / 26

Scores out of 100. Blue = Ford Focus ST · Orange = Ford Puma ST

Specs side-by-side

Spec Ford Focus ST Ford Puma ST
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Ford Focus ST

  • Efficient for its class at 6.4 L/100 km combined
  • Predictable, easy-to-drive FWD layout for year-round commuting
  • Balanced for family-compact needs with enough comfort for road trips
  • Strong safety and reliability signals in its segment

Ford Puma ST

  • Punchy acceleration (0–100 km/h in 6.7s) for confident merging and passing
  • Efficient for its class at 6.9 L/100km to help manage running costs
  • Practical 456 L boot and five seats suit growing families
  • Pricing around 30,000 represents good value in its segment

Verdict

Pick Ford Focus ST if…
Best fuel economy
Ford Focus ST uses 6.4 L/100km vs 6.9 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.
Pick Ford Puma ST if…
Performance & capability
Ford Puma ST is the choice if you want more power, speed, or all-weather capability.

Related comparisons