Ford Focus Electric
Hatchback · Electric · FWD
vs
Ford Puma ST
Hatchback · Gasoline · FWD
Ford Focus Electric
Car A
Ford Focus Electric
A compact electric model tuned for city driving, offering five seats and a useful 443 L trunk. Its 183 km range and modest pace make it a sensible daily choice rather than a long-distance cruiser.
5 seatsHatchbackElectric5-star safetyElectric
Ford Puma ST
Car B
Ford Puma ST
The Ford Puma ST combines lively performance with everyday usefulness, pairing 0–100 km/h in 6.7s with a 456 L boot and five seats. It’s efficient for its class at 6.9 L/100km and offers good value in its segment around 30,000.
5 seatsHatchbackGasoline5-star safety200 hp
Why compared performance gapdifferent powertrainsame body typesame brandsame seatssimilar price

Usage fit

Family 65 / 65
City 77 / 59
Budget / value 70 / 64
Road trip 38 / 41
Performance 26 / 28
Cargo 24 / 25
Practical 56 / 51
Premium 23 / 25
Winter 26 / 26

Scores out of 100. Blue = Ford Focus Electric · Orange = Ford Puma ST

Specs side-by-side

Spec Ford Focus Electric Ford Puma ST
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Ford Focus Electric

  • Electric powertrain and FWD suit stop-start urban commutes
  • Good value in its segment at 29,999
  • Practical for a compact: five seats and 443 L of cargo space
  • Prioritizes reliability and safety in its positioning

Ford Puma ST

  • Punchy acceleration (0–100 km/h in 6.7s) for confident merging and passing
  • Efficient for its class at 6.9 L/100km to help manage running costs
  • Practical 456 L boot and five seats suit growing families
  • Pricing around 30,000 represents good value in its segment

Verdict

Pick Ford Focus Electric if…
Lower entry price
Ford Focus Electric starts lower, making it the stronger value pick if budget is a priority.
Pick Ford Puma ST if…
More power
Ford Puma ST puts out 200 hp vs 143 — meaningfully quicker and more confident on motorways.

Related comparisons