Ford Focus Active
Hatchback · Gasoline · FWD
vs
Ford Puma ST
Hatchback · Gasoline · FWD
Ford Focus Active
Car A
Ford Focus Active
A compact, city-friendly five-seater that balances efficiency and pace at a price that makes sense for small families. Best for urban commuting; less ideal if you need lots of cargo room or premium trimmings.
5 seatsHatchbackGasoline5-star safety5.5 L/100km
Ford Puma ST
Car B
Ford Puma ST
The Ford Puma ST combines lively performance with everyday usefulness, pairing 0–100 km/h in 6.7s with a 456 L boot and five seats. It’s efficient for its class at 6.9 L/100km and offers good value in its segment around 30,000.
5 seatsHatchbackGasoline5-star safety200 hp
Why compared same body typesame brandsame powertrainsame seats

Usage fit

Family 54 / 65
City 63 / 59
Budget / value 55 / 64
Road trip 41 / 41
Performance 30 / 28
Cargo 20 / 25
Practical 39 / 51
Premium 22 / 25
Winter 26 / 26

Scores out of 100. Blue = Ford Focus Active · Orange = Ford Puma ST

Specs side-by-side

Spec Ford Focus Active Ford Puma ST
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Ford Focus Active

  • Efficient for city commutes at 5.5 L/100km
  • Strong 0–100 km/h in 8.0 s helps with confident merging
  • Five-seat practicality suits small families
  • Priced at 22,000, representing good value in its segment

Ford Puma ST

  • Punchy acceleration (0–100 km/h in 6.7s) for confident merging and passing
  • Efficient for its class at 6.9 L/100km to help manage running costs
  • Practical 456 L boot and five seats suit growing families
  • Pricing around 30,000 represents good value in its segment

Verdict

Pick Ford Focus Active if…
Best fuel economy
Ford Focus Active uses 5.5 L/100km vs 6.9 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.
Pick Ford Puma ST if…
More power
Ford Puma ST puts out 200 hp vs 180 — meaningfully quicker and more confident on motorways.

Related comparisons