Ford Focus vs Ford Puma ST — full comparison

Ford Focus

Hatchback · Gasoline · FWD

Ford Puma ST

Hatchback · Gasoline · FWD

Car A

Ford Focus

A compact, FWD gasoline Ford Focus suited to city driving and budget‑minded families, balancing adequate performance with efficient consumption. Emphasis on reliability and safety makes it a sensible daily driver, though cargo space is modest.

5 seatsHatchbackGasoline5-star safety6.5 L/100km

Car B

Ford Puma ST

The Ford Puma ST combines lively performance with everyday usefulness, pairing 0–100 km/h in 6.7s with a 456 L boot and five seats. It’s efficient for its class at 6.9 L/100km and offers good value in its segment around 30,000.

5 seatsHatchbackGasoline5-star safety200 hp

Why compared same body typesame brandsame powertrainsame seats

Usage fit

Family 63 / 65

City 73 / 59

Budget / value 71 / 64

Road trip 31 / 41

Performance 31 / 28

Cargo 20 / 25

Practical 51 / 51

Premium 15 / 25

Winter 20 / 26

Scores out of 100. Blue = Ford Focus · Orange = Ford Puma ST

Specs side-by-side

Spec Ford Focus Ford Puma ST

Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Ford Focus

Good value in its segment for the price
Efficient for its class at 6.5 L/100 km, keeping running costs low
City-friendly compact footprint with FWD traction and easy maneuvering
Balanced performance (150 hp, 240 Nm, 0–100 km/h in 8.5 s) for daily commuting
Modest 360-liter trunk limits cargo-heavy use
Not positioned for premium features or finishes
FWD only; no AWD option for challenging conditions
Gasoline-only lineup with no hybrid alternative

Ford Puma ST

Punchy acceleration (0–100 km/h in 6.7s) for confident merging and passing
Efficient for its class at 6.9 L/100km to help manage running costs
Practical 456 L boot and five seats suit growing families
Pricing around 30,000 represents good value in its segment
FWD only, with no AWD option for those prioritizing extra traction
Not ideal for cargo-heavy use despite a decent trunk
Gasoline-only powertrain; no hybrid or EV alternative listed
Performance emphasis may not suit comfort-first buyers

Verdict

Pick Ford Focus if…

Best fuel economy

Ford Focus uses 6.5 L/100km vs 6.9 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.

Pick Ford Puma ST if…

More power

Ford Puma ST puts out 200 hp vs 150 — meaningfully quicker and more confident on motorways.

Usage fit

Specs side-by-side

Pros & cons

Ford Focus

Ford Puma ST

Verdict

Related comparisons