Ford Ranger Wildtrak
Pickup · Diesel · 4WD
vs
Ford F-150 Lariat
Pickup · Gasoline · 4WD
Ford Ranger Wildtrak
Car A
Ford Ranger Wildtrak
The Ford Ranger Wildtrak blends an efficient 2.0L bi‑turbo diesel with 4WD and generous cargo space, making it a practical work-and-family pick. It favors utility and good value in its segment over outright speed or a premium feel.
5 seatsPickupDiesel5-star safety8.5 L/100km
Ford F-150 Lariat
Car B
Ford F-150 Lariat
The Ford F-150 Lariat combines a 4WD V6, five seats, and a sizable 1320 L cargo area to suit cargo-heavy work and long road trips. It trades city convenience and efficiency for utility and solid everyday performance.
5 seatsPickupGasoline5-star safety290 hp
Why compared performance gapdifferent powertrainsame body typesame brandsame seatssimilar price

Usage fit

Family 72 / 72
City 39 / 20
Budget / value 54 / 48
Road trip 60 / 72
Performance 32 / 26
Cargo 80 / 80
Practical 49 / 44
Premium 28 / 37
Winter 26 / 30

Scores out of 100. Blue = Ford Ranger Wildtrak · Orange = Ford F-150 Lariat

Specs side-by-side

Spec Ford Ranger Wildtrak Ford F-150 Lariat
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Ford Ranger Wildtrak

  • Efficient for its class at 8.5 L/100 km for daily miles and road trips
  • 500 Nm torque and 4WD support confident, loaded driving
  • 1260 L cargo capacity suits tools, equipment, and adventure gear
  • Five seats make it usable for growing families as well as work

Ford F-150 Lariat

  • 4WD traction and 420 Nm torque support confident utility use.
  • Large 1320 L cargo area fits work gear and travel luggage.
  • Seats five comfortably for road trips and growing families.
  • Brisk 0–100 km/h in 6.5 s and 290 hp aid passing and merging.

Verdict

Pick Ford Ranger Wildtrak if…
Best fuel economy
Ford Ranger Wildtrak uses 8.5 L/100km vs 12.3 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.
Pick Ford F-150 Lariat if…
More power
Ford F-150 Lariat puts out 290 hp vs 210 — meaningfully quicker and more confident on motorways.

Related comparisons