Ford EcoSport SES
Suv · Gasoline
vs
Ford Equator Sport
Suv · Gasoline
Ford EcoSport SES
Car A
Ford EcoSport SES
The Ford EcoSport SES focuses on city-friendly, cost-conscious driving with a 1.0L EcoBoost and an efficient 6.5 L/100 km. It favors practicality and everyday dependability over premium feel or outright performance.
5 seatsSuvGasoline4-star safety6.5 L/100km
Ford Equator Sport
Car B
Ford Equator Sport
The Ford Equator Sport suits budget-focused buyers who need a practical five-seat model with useful cargo space. Its 7.5 L/100 km efficiency and 200 hp performance make it a balanced daily driver rather than a premium pick.
5 seatsSuvGasoline200 hp
Why compared performance gapsame body typesame brandsame powertrainsame seatssame usage profile

Usage fit

Family 62 / 44
City 62 / 31
Budget / value 65 / 50
Road trip 35 / 17
Performance 26 / 29
Cargo 28 / 36
Practical 51 / 41
Premium 14 / 5
Winter 26 / 10

Scores out of 100. Blue = Ford EcoSport SES · Orange = Ford Equator Sport

Specs side-by-side

Spec Ford EcoSport SES Ford Equator Sport
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Ford EcoSport SES

  • Efficient for its class at 6.5 L/100 km, helping keep running costs in check
  • 1.0L EcoBoost delivers smooth, easygoing power for urban commutes
  • Practical 375 L trunk and 5 seats suit compact-family needs
  • Good value in its segment for budget-focused buyers

Ford Equator Sport

  • Good value in its segment at around 25,000 with a practical five-seat layout
  • Efficient for its class at 7.5 L/100 km, helping manage fuel costs
  • Versatile cargo room: 500 liters handles family and everyday gear
  • Sufficient performance (200 hp, 300 Nm, 0–100 km/h in 9.5 s) for confident merging and overtakes

Verdict

Pick Ford EcoSport SES if…
Best fuel economy
Ford EcoSport SES uses 6.5 L/100km vs 7.5 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.
Pick Ford Equator Sport if…
More power
Ford Equator Sport puts out 200 hp vs 123 — meaningfully quicker and more confident on motorways.

Related comparisons