Ford Puma Titanium
Crossover · Gasoline
vs
Ford EcoSport Active
Crossover · Gasoline
Ford Puma Titanium
Car A
Ford Puma Titanium
Practical and easy to live with for growing families, the Ford Puma Titanium pairs five-seat flexibility with a roomy 456 L boot and brisk everyday pace. At 28,000, it offers good value in its segment for city-focused commuting and weekend duties.
5 seatsCrossoverGasoline5-star safety5.2 L/100km155 hp
Ford EcoSport Active
Car B
Ford EcoSport Active
The Ford EcoSport Active suits budget-focused city driving and small-family duties, pairing efficient 6.5 L/100 km use with a practical 355 L trunk. It offers good value in its segment if you prioritize everyday usability over performance or luxury.
5 seatsCrossoverGasoline4-star safety
Why compared same body typesame brandsame powertrainsame seats

Usage fit

Family 70 / 58
City 69 / 56
Budget / value 70 / 68
Road trip 40 / 44
Performance 25 / 26
Cargo 32 / 26
Practical 55 / 49
Premium 17 / 18
Winter 28 / 30

Scores out of 100. Blue = Ford Puma Titanium · Orange = Ford EcoSport Active

Specs side-by-side

Spec Ford Puma Titanium Ford EcoSport Active
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Ford Puma Titanium

  • Efficient for its class at 5.2 L/100 km, easing fuel costs
  • 456 L cargo space suits strollers, sports gear, and weekend bags
  • Brisk 0–100 km/h in 8.0 s helps with urban merges and overtakes
  • Safety and reliability are highlighted strengths in its positioning

Ford EcoSport Active

  • Good value in its segment around 20000
  • Efficient for its class with 6.5 L/100 km combined
  • Practical 5-seat layout and 355 L trunk suit small families
  • Adequate city performance (125 hp, 0–100 km/h in 9.9 s)

Verdict

Pick Ford Puma Titanium if…
Best fuel economy
Ford Puma Titanium uses 5.2 L/100km vs 6.5 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.
Pick Ford EcoSport Active if…
Performance & capability
Ford EcoSport Active is the choice if you want more power, speed, or all-weather capability.

Related comparisons