Ford Ranger XLT
Pickup · Gasoline · 4WD
vs
Chevrolet Colorado ZR2
Pickup · Electric · AWD
Ford Ranger XLT
Car A
Ford Ranger XLT
With 4WD, 270 hp/500 Nm, and a 1200‑liter cargo area, the Ford Ranger XLT leans toward cargo‑heavy work while still fitting a family of five. Efficiency isn’t a highlight, but it offers good value in its segment for mixed work and daily use.
5 seatsPickupGasoline4-star safety9.5 L/100km
Chevrolet Colorado ZR2
Car B
Chevrolet Colorado ZR2
The Chevrolet Colorado ZR2 blends strong V6 power, AWD traction, and five-seat versatility with good value in its segment. Trade-offs include higher fuel use and limited enclosed cargo space.
5 seatsPickupElectric277 hpAWDElectric
Why compared same body typesame ranking profilesame seats

Usage fit

Family 66 / 24
City 39 / 45
Budget / value 58 / 34
Road trip 55 / 30
Performance 35 / 28
Cargo 80 / 29
Practical 48 / 19
Premium 24 / 22
Winter 22 / 14

Scores out of 100. Blue = Ford Ranger XLT · Orange = Chevrolet Colorado ZR2

Specs side-by-side

Spec Ford Ranger XLT Chevrolet Colorado ZR2
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Ford Ranger XLT

  • 4WD traction for varied surfaces
  • 270 hp and 500 Nm deliver strong, load‑friendly performance
  • Five seats suit growing families alongside work needs
  • Good value in its segment at $32,500

Chevrolet Colorado ZR2

  • Quick 0-100 km/h in 7.5 s helps with confident city merging
  • 500 Nm torque and 277 hp deliver responsive performance
  • AWD adds traction on varied road surfaces
  • Priced at 45,700 for good value in its segment

Verdict

Pick Ford Ranger XLT if…
Best fuel economy
Ford Ranger XLT uses 9.5 L/100km vs 11.8 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.
Pick Chevrolet Colorado ZR2 if…
All-wheel drive
Chevrolet Colorado ZR2's AWD adds real-world confidence in wet, icy, or mixed-weather conditions.

Related comparisons