BMW i4 eDrive40
Coupe · Electric · FWD
vs
Ford Mustang Shelby GT500
Coupe · Gasoline
BMW i4 eDrive40
Car A
BMW i4 eDrive40
An electric coupe with five seats, strong power, and long range that reads as good value in its segment. Its FWD layout and coupe profile suit commuters and road trippers who don’t need SUV-like versatility.
5 seatsCoupeElectric5-star safetyElectric
Ford Mustang Shelby GT500
Car B
Ford Mustang Shelby GT500
The Ford Mustang Shelby GT500 is a performance-first 4-seater with a supercharged V8 delivering 0–100 km/h in 3.5 s and a 290 km/h top speed. It pairs extreme pace with enough space for short road trips, but efficiency and city suitability are not its strengths.
4 seatsCoupeGasoline4-star safety760 hp
Why compared more powercomparison picksame body typestep-up pricestrong ranking match

Usage fit

Family 43 / 40
City 38 / 15
Budget / value 25 / 39
Road trip 48 / 47
Performance 37 / 58
Cargo 26 / 20
Practical 14 / 26
Premium 54 / 48
Winter 26 / 26

Scores out of 100. Blue = BMW i4 eDrive40 · Orange = Ford Mustang Shelby GT500

Specs side-by-side

Spec BMW i4 eDrive40 Ford Mustang Shelby GT500
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

BMW i4 eDrive40

  • 590 km range supports long trips with fewer stops.
  • 340 hp and 5.7 s 0–100 km/h provide confident acceleration.
  • Five seats and a 470 L trunk fit growing-family needs.
  • Good value in its segment given its range and power.

Ford Mustang Shelby GT500

  • Very quick: 0–100 km/h in 3.5 s and 290 km/h top speed.
  • Supercharged V8 with 760 hp and 847 Nm for immediate thrust.
  • Four seats and a 404 L trunk support weekend road trips.
  • Delivers strong performance for the price (70,000); good value in its segment.

Verdict

Pick BMW i4 eDrive40 if…
Lower entry price
BMW i4 eDrive40 starts lower, making it the stronger value pick if budget is a priority.
Pick Ford Mustang Shelby GT500 if…
More power
Ford Mustang Shelby GT500 puts out 760 hp vs 340 — meaningfully quicker and more confident on motorways.

Related comparisons