Ford Puma ST-Line
Hatchback · Gasoline · FWD
vs
BMW 225e Active Tourer
Hatchback · Hybrid · FWD
Ford Puma ST-Line
Car A
Ford Puma ST-Line
The Ford Puma ST-Line blends family-friendly space with efficient running and punchy acceleration. It suits growing families and city driving while offering good value in its segment.
5 seatsHatchbackGasoline5-star safety
BMW 225e Active Tourer
Car B
BMW 225e Active Tourer
The BMW 225e Active Tourer is a hybrid 5-seat hatchback tailored to city use, pairing a 57 km electric-only range with very low 1.6 combined consumption. It adds brisk 0-100 km/h in 6.6 s and a practical 405-liter trunk, making it a balanced family compact with good value in its segment.
5 seatsHatchbackHybrid5-star safety1.6 L/100km220 hpHybrid
Why compared better on fuelcomparison picksame body typesame seatsstep-up price

Usage fit

Family 65 / 55
City 60 / 64
Budget / value 65 / 53
Road trip 41 / 42
Performance 29 / 23
Cargo 25 / 22
Practical 52 / 43
Premium 25 / 47
Winter 26 / 26

Scores out of 100. Blue = Ford Puma ST-Line · Orange = BMW 225e Active Tourer

Specs side-by-side

Spec Ford Puma ST-Line BMW 225e Active Tourer
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Ford Puma ST-Line

  • Efficient for its class with 6.5 combined consumption.
  • Brisk 0–100 km/h in 6.7 s for confident merging and overtakes.
  • 456 L boot and five seats work well for growing-family errands and trips.
  • Around 30,000, it represents good value in its segment.

BMW 225e Active Tourer

  • Efficient for city commutes with 57 km electric-only range and 1.6 combined consumption
  • Quick acceleration (0-100 km/h in 6.6 s) for confident merging and overtakes
  • Practical 5-seat layout with a 405-liter trunk for everyday family errands
  • Price of 38000 offers good value in its segment

Verdict

Pick Ford Puma ST-Line if…
Lower entry price
Ford Puma ST-Line starts lower, making it the stronger value pick if budget is a priority.
Pick BMW 225e Active Tourer if…
More power
BMW 225e Active Tourer puts out 220 hp vs 200 — meaningfully quicker and more confident on motorways.

Related comparisons