Ford Puma ST vs BMW 225e Active Tourer

Ford Puma ST

Hatchback · Gasoline · FWD

BMW 225e Active Tourer

Hatchback · Hybrid · FWD

Car A

Ford Puma ST

The Ford Puma ST combines lively performance with everyday usefulness, pairing 0–100 km/h in 6.7s with a 456 L boot and five seats. It’s efficient for its class at 6.9 L/100km and offers good value in its segment around 30,000.

5 seatsHatchbackGasoline5-star safety

Car B

BMW 225e Active Tourer

The BMW 225e Active Tourer is a hybrid 5-seat hatchback tailored to city use, pairing a 57 km electric-only range with very low 1.6 combined consumption. It adds brisk 0-100 km/h in 6.6 s and a practical 405-liter trunk, making it a balanced family compact with good value in its segment.

5 seatsHatchbackHybrid5-star safety1.6 L/100km220 hpHybrid

Why compared better on fuelcomparison picksame body typesame seatsstep-up price

Usage fit

Family 65 / 55

City 59 / 64

Budget / value 64 / 53

Road trip 41 / 42

Performance 28 / 23

Cargo 25 / 22

Practical 51 / 43

Premium 25 / 47

Winter 26 / 26

Scores out of 100. Blue = Ford Puma ST · Orange = BMW 225e Active Tourer

Specs side-by-side

Spec Ford Puma ST BMW 225e Active Tourer

Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Ford Puma ST

Punchy acceleration (0–100 km/h in 6.7s) for confident merging and passing
Efficient for its class at 6.9 L/100km to help manage running costs
Practical 456 L boot and five seats suit growing families
Pricing around 30,000 represents good value in its segment
FWD only, with no AWD option for those prioritizing extra traction
Not ideal for cargo-heavy use despite a decent trunk
Gasoline-only powertrain; no hybrid or EV alternative listed
Performance emphasis may not suit comfort-first buyers

BMW 225e Active Tourer

Efficient for city commutes with 57 km electric-only range and 1.6 combined consumption
Quick acceleration (0-100 km/h in 6.6 s) for confident merging and overtakes
Practical 5-seat layout with a 405-liter trunk for everyday family errands
Price of 38000 offers good value in its segment
405-liter trunk can feel limited for cargo-heavy needs
Front-wheel drive only; no AWD on this variant
57 km electric range may not cover longer daily routes without frequent charging
Prioritizes efficiency over enthusiast-oriented performance and handling

Verdict

Pick Ford Puma ST if…

Lower entry price

Ford Puma ST starts lower, making it the stronger value pick if budget is a priority.

Pick BMW 225e Active Tourer if…

More power

BMW 225e Active Tourer puts out 220 hp vs 200 — meaningfully quicker and more confident on motorways.

Usage fit

Specs side-by-side

Pros & cons

Ford Puma ST

BMW 225e Active Tourer

Verdict

Related comparisons