BMW 218i Active Tourer
Hatchback · Gasoline · FWD
vs
Ford Puma ST
Hatchback · Gasoline · FWD
BMW 218i Active Tourer
Car A
BMW 218i Active Tourer
The BMW 218i Active Tourer is an efficient, city-friendly hatchback with enough room for a small family. It offers good value in its segment with balanced performance and a strong safety standing.
5 seatsHatchbackGasoline5-star safety5.6 L/100km
Ford Puma ST
Car B
Ford Puma ST
The Ford Puma ST combines lively performance with everyday usefulness, pairing 0–100 km/h in 6.7s with a 456 L boot and five seats. It’s efficient for its class at 6.9 L/100km and offers good value in its segment around 30,000.
5 seatsHatchbackGasoline5-star safety200 hp
Why compared cross brandsame body typesame powertrainsame seatssimilar price

Usage fit

Family 55 / 65
City 60 / 59
Budget / value 48 / 64
Road trip 42 / 41
Performance 31 / 28
Cargo 23 / 25
Practical 40 / 51
Premium 45 / 25
Winter 26 / 26

Scores out of 100. Blue = BMW 218i Active Tourer · Orange = Ford Puma ST

Specs side-by-side

Spec BMW 218i Active Tourer Ford Puma ST
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

BMW 218i Active Tourer

  • Efficient for its class (5.6 L/100 km) helps keep urban fuel costs down
  • Balanced city performance with 0–100 km/h in 8.5 s for confident merging
  • Practical five-seat layout and a usable 415 L trunk for daily family needs
  • Strong safety standing within its segment

Ford Puma ST

  • Punchy acceleration (0–100 km/h in 6.7s) for confident merging and passing
  • Efficient for its class at 6.9 L/100km to help manage running costs
  • Practical 456 L boot and five seats suit growing families
  • Pricing around 30,000 represents good value in its segment

Verdict

Pick BMW 218i Active Tourer if…
Best fuel economy
BMW 218i Active Tourer uses 5.6 L/100km vs 6.9 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.
Pick Ford Puma ST if…
More power
Ford Puma ST puts out 200 hp vs 136 — meaningfully quicker and more confident on motorways.

Related comparisons