Ford Focus ST
Hatchback · Gasoline · FWD
vs
Audi S3 Sportback
Hatchback · Gasoline · AWD
Ford Focus ST
Car A
Ford Focus ST
A compact family car that emphasizes efficiency and everyday ease, the Ford Focus ST returns 6.4 L/100 km combined with predictable FWD manners. Ideal for city use and road trips, but not for cargo-heavy hauling or performance thrills.
5 seatsHatchbackGasoline5-star safety6.4 L/100km
Audi S3 Sportback
Car B
Audi S3 Sportback
The Audi S3 Sportback balances compact family use with all‑weather AWD and brisk acceleration. With five seats, a 380 L trunk, and 7.3 L/100 km efficiency, it offers good value in its segment without track pretensions.
5 seatsHatchbackGasoline5-star safetyAWD
Why compared same body typesame powertrainsame usage profile

Usage fit

Family 43 / 65
City 33 / 56
Budget / value 15 / 62
Road trip 36 / 46
Performance 4 / 39
Cargo 0 / 21
Practical 28 / 52
Premium 18 / 50
Winter 26 / 66

Scores out of 100. Blue = Ford Focus ST · Orange = Audi S3 Sportback

Specs side-by-side

Spec Ford Focus ST Audi S3 Sportback
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Ford Focus ST

  • Efficient for its class at 6.4 L/100 km combined
  • Predictable, easy-to-drive FWD layout for year-round commuting
  • Balanced for family-compact needs with enough comfort for road trips
  • Strong safety and reliability signals in its segment

Audi S3 Sportback

  • AWD traction supports confident winter and wet‑road driving
  • Quick 0–100 km/h in 4.8 s makes overtakes and on‑ramps easy
  • Efficient for its class at a combined 7.3 L/100 km
  • Five seats and a usable 380 L cargo area suit daily family and city use

Verdict

Pick Ford Focus ST if…
Best fuel economy
Ford Focus ST uses 6.4 L/100km vs 7.3 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.
Pick Audi S3 Sportback if…
All-wheel drive
Audi S3 Sportback's AWD adds real-world confidence in wet, icy, or mixed-weather conditions.

Related comparisons