Ford EcoSport Active
Crossover · Gasoline
vs
Audi Q5 2.0 TFSI e
Crossover · Hybrid · AWD
Ford EcoSport Active
Car A
Ford EcoSport Active
The Ford EcoSport Active suits budget-focused city driving and small-family duties, pairing efficient 6.5 L/100 km use with a practical 355 L trunk. It offers good value in its segment if you prioritize everyday usability over performance or luxury.
5 seatsCrossoverGasoline4-star safety
Audi Q5 2.0 TFSI e
Car B
Audi Q5 2.0 TFSI e
The Audi Q5 2.0 TFSI e suits growing families who want AWD confidence and low running costs from regular charging. EV range is modest, and while quick, it isn’t aimed at cargo-heavy or performance-focused driving.
5 seatsCrossoverHybrid5-star safety2 L/100km265 hpAWDHybrid
Why compared same body typesame ranking profilesame seatsstrong ranking match

Usage fit

Family 58 / 65
City 56 / 56
Budget / value 68 / 45
Road trip 44 / 64
Performance 26 / 33
Cargo 26 / 41
Practical 49 / 48
Premium 18 / 52
Winter 30 / 74

Scores out of 100. Blue = Ford EcoSport Active · Orange = Audi Q5 2.0 TFSI e

Specs side-by-side

Spec Ford EcoSport Active Audi Q5 2.0 TFSI e
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Ford EcoSport Active

  • Good value in its segment around 20000
  • Efficient for its class with 6.5 L/100 km combined
  • Practical 5-seat layout and 355 L trunk suit small families
  • Adequate city performance (125 hp, 0–100 km/h in 9.9 s)

Audi Q5 2.0 TFSI e

  • Efficient for its class: 2.0 L/100 km combined when charged regularly
  • About 45 km electric range covers many city trips
  • AWD traction supports winter driving and road trips
  • Spacious five seats with a 610 L boot for family use

Verdict

Pick Ford EcoSport Active if…
Lower entry price
Ford EcoSport Active starts lower, making it the stronger value pick if budget is a priority.
Pick Audi Q5 2.0 TFSI e if…
All-wheel drive
Audi Q5 2.0 TFSI e's AWD adds real-world confidence in wet, icy, or mixed-weather conditions.

Related comparisons