Audi Q2 Design
Crossover · Gasoline · AWD
vs
Ford Puma Vignale
Crossover · Gasoline
Audi Q2 Design
Car A
Audi Q2 Design
The Audi Q2 Design pairs efficient running with AWD traction and usable space for five, making it a solid fit for family‑compact and city duties. It delivers good value in its segment without demanding compromises in day‑to‑day comfort.
5 seatsCrossoverGasoline5-star safety5.2 L/100kmAWD
Ford Puma Vignale
Car B
Ford Puma Vignale
The Ford Puma Vignale mixes everyday practicality with strong efficiency, making sense for growing families and city use. It also delivers brisk 0–100 km/h in 7 s without chasing performance thrills.
5 seatsCrossoverGasoline5-star safety155 hp
Why compared better on fuelbetter valuecomparison pickcross brandsame body typesame powertrain

Usage fit

Family 69 / 69
City 68 / 55
Budget / value 67 / 64
Road trip 44 / 49
Performance 28 / 22
Cargo 29 / 32
Practical 54 / 53
Premium 39 / 25
Winter 68 / 34

Scores out of 100. Blue = Audi Q2 Design · Orange = Ford Puma Vignale

Specs side-by-side

Spec Audi Q2 Design Ford Puma Vignale
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Audi Q2 Design

  • Efficient for its class at 5.2 combined consumption
  • AWD traction boosts confidence in winter and mixed conditions
  • Practical 5‑seat cabin and 405 L trunk for everyday family use
  • At 35,000, it represents good value in its segment

Ford Puma Vignale

  • Efficient for its class at 5.7 L/100 km
  • 456 L trunk and 5 seats suit growing families
  • Quick 0–100 km/h in 7 s for confident merging
  • Good value in its segment around the 35,000 price point

Verdict

Pick Audi Q2 Design if…
Best fuel economy
Audi Q2 Design uses 5.2 L/100km vs 5.7 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.
Pick Ford Puma Vignale if…
More power
Ford Puma Vignale puts out 155 hp vs 150 — meaningfully quicker and more confident on motorways.

Related comparisons