Audi Q2 35 TFSI vs Ford Puma Active

Audi Q2 35 TFSI

Crossover · Gasoline · AWD

Ford Puma Active

Crossover · Gasoline

Car A

Audi Q2 35 TFSI

A compact AWD five-seater that blends efficient 1.5 TFSI running with enough pace and a usable 405 L boot for city and small-family duties, offering good value in its segment. Less suited to cargo-heavy use or thrill-seeking performance.

5 seatsCrossoverGasoline5-star safety5.3 L/100kmAWD

Car B

Ford Puma Active

The Ford Puma Active prioritizes city-friendly efficiency and practicality, with a roomy 456 L boot and five seats backed by 5.7 L/100 km consumption. It represents good value in its segment, but it’s not aimed at premium or performance seekers.

5 seatsCrossoverGasoline5-star safety155 hp

Why compared same body typesame powertrainsame seatssame usage profile

Usage fit

Family 59 / 69

City 68 / 69

Budget / value 52 / 68

Road trip 44 / 40

Performance 32 / 27

Cargo 29 / 32

Practical 40 / 53

Premium 38 / 16

Winter 68 / 28

Scores out of 100. Blue = Audi Q2 35 TFSI · Orange = Ford Puma Active

Specs side-by-side

Spec Audi Q2 35 TFSI Ford Puma Active

Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Audi Q2 35 TFSI

Efficient for its class at 5.3 combined consumption
AWD traction supports city commuting and winter conditions
Practical for small families with 5 seats and a 405 L trunk
Respectable daily pace: 0–100 km/h in 8.4 s from 150 hp
405 L cargo space can feel tight for gear-heavy trips
Acceleration is more sensible than sporty (8.4 s 0–100 km/h)
Five seats only with no third-row option
No electric driving range or battery option

Ford Puma Active

Efficient for its class at 5.7 L/100 km, easing daily fuel use.
Generous 456 L trunk supports errands and family weekends.
Balanced everyday performance (0–100 km/h in 9.0 s, 155 hp, 240 Nm).
Five-seat versatility and a 25,000 price point offer good value in its segment.
Not for performance driving; 0–100 km/h in 9.0 s and 155 hp emphasize usability over thrills.
Only five seats, so larger families may need more capacity.
If you want premium branding or upscale interiors, this model isn’t positioned as premium.
Shoppers chasing the absolute lowest purchase price may find smaller city cars cheaper.

Verdict

Pick Audi Q2 35 TFSI if…

Best fuel economy

Audi Q2 35 TFSI uses 5.3 L/100km vs 5.7 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.

Pick Ford Puma Active if…

More power

Ford Puma Active puts out 155 hp vs 150 — meaningfully quicker and more confident on motorways.

Usage fit

Specs side-by-side

Pros & cons

Audi Q2 35 TFSI

Ford Puma Active

Verdict

Related comparisons