Audi Q2 2.0 TFSI quattro
Suv · Gasoline · AWD
vs
Ford Equator XLT
Suv · Gasoline
Audi Q2 2.0 TFSI quattro
Car A
Audi Q2 2.0 TFSI quattro
AWD traction, brisk acceleration, and a 6.2 combined consumption make the Audi Q2 2.0 TFSI quattro well-suited to city and compact-family use. With 5 seats, a 405-liter trunk, and a 35,000 price, it offers good value in its segment.
5 seatsSuvGasoline5-star safety6.2 L/100kmAWD
Ford Equator XLT
Car B
Ford Equator XLT
The Ford Equator XLT mixes strong V6 performance with useful space at a price that reads as good value in its segment. It suits growing families who want practical cargo room and respectable efficiency for its class.
5 seatsSuvGasoline250 hp
Why compared cross brandsame body typesame powertrainsame seatssimilar price

Usage fit

Family 61 / 44
City 61 / 28
Budget / value 49 / 45
Road trip 45 / 17
Performance 29 / 31
Cargo 30 / 36
Practical 40 / 40
Premium 40 / 9
Winter 70 / 10

Scores out of 100. Blue = Audi Q2 2.0 TFSI quattro · Orange = Ford Equator XLT

Specs side-by-side

Spec Audi Q2 2.0 TFSI quattro Ford Equator XLT
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Audi Q2 2.0 TFSI quattro

  • All-wheel drive traction for confident commuting in mixed weather
  • Efficient for its class with 6.2 combined consumption
  • Seats 5 with a 405-liter trunk for small-family duties
  • Priced at 35,000, it offers good value in its segment

Ford Equator XLT

  • Strong V6 output (250 hp, 400 Nm) for confident daily driving
  • 500 L trunk and 5 seats work well for growing families
  • Efficient for its class with 8.2 combined consumption
  • Price around 35,000 offers good value in its segment

Verdict

Pick Audi Q2 2.0 TFSI quattro if…
Best fuel economy
Audi Q2 2.0 TFSI quattro uses 6.2 L/100km vs 8.2 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.
Pick Ford Equator XLT if…
More power
Ford Equator XLT puts out 250 hp vs 190 — meaningfully quicker and more confident on motorways.

Related comparisons